Initially the term "third culture" was used to refer to the process of learning how to relate to another culture; in time, the meaning of the term changed and children who accompany their parents into a different culture were referred to as "Third Culture Kids". The TCK builds relationships to all of the cultures, while not having full ownership of any. Although elements from each culture are assimilated into the TCK's life experience, the sense of belonging is in relationship to others of a similar background. Entering another culture without one's parents, such as on a foreign exchange program, explicitly does not make one a TCK.
And to be frank, it was sparked through recent conversations in my life from discussions about SpaceX and Batman, sorry, I mean Elon Musk, trying to build colonies to save us from being trapped here on Earth.
So I have a question for you. One I want you to consider as the cultural adapter you are, having watched so many people and absorbed so many cultures in your developmental years. Does our species, in our current state and with where we are currently heading, have the capacity to survive and endure?
Think about it for a moment, and decide on an answer. If we do have the capacity to survive and endure, do we deserve to? The simple concept of spreading our species across the galaxy is the only way to ensure, in the event of total planetary destruction, that we do not disappear from existence.
In that simple moment, humanity would be wiped out. But the question runs deeper than that. There are other elements to consider, too.
Take, for example, the fact that all intelligent species are required to pass a pinnacle moment in their evolution in which the entire species possesses the knowledge to eradicate the entire species, and as an entire species, they must make the decision not to.
That fact is a basic inevitability of scientific advancement. The advent of nuclear technology was the first time humanity, in its entire history, held the power to eradicate all life across the planet with the push of a button.
But that technology and the power it possesses is entirely controlled. So what does this mean? Robots that build themselves, and do so by attacking a certain thing. That same technology could be used to eradicate all life on Earth. The simple advancement of knowledge means that more information becomes more readily available every single day.
There will, barring the event we regress instead of continue forward in technological development, be a time where the ability to create this technology or something even worse, will be taught at a grade-school level.
Unlike nuclear options where the materials are hard to develop and even harder to deploy, technology like nano-bots could be something that a third grade science classroom could create, code, and release.
It may not be that. It may be something else entirely. But one day, we will discover knowledge that allows us to effectively delete all life, and one day further down the line, that knowledge will be available to every single human on Earth, just by the nature of scientific progress.
One day, we as a species will have the ability to answer it. Everyone on Earth will have the capacity to destroy everyone else. Mutually assured destruction not just in the hands of world leaders, but in the hands of every single living, breathing, thinking person on the planet, with the tools and resources available to anyone to wipe out everything we have ever known.
This is why I ask you this question, my cultural specialists, why I want to know what you think about the inevitability of this crossroads in intelligence. Our species has empathy, but empathy only extends as far as our neighbor in the grand scheme of life.
The world can be a terrible place, where horrible things happen to countless numbers of people, but we, as a species, have the ability to turn off that empathy because it does not directly impact us or those we love.
It is why acts of empathy to strangers go viral so often, why a homeless man getting bought shoes by a police officer spreads across the internet like wildfire. Because in the end, the vast majority of people, while seeing the value and kindness in that empathy, would not have done it.
I do not believe we are fit to endure until we overcome our empathy block. Until we can love everyone like we love those immediately in our empathy circle, we do not belong among the stars. The universe does not need our hatred, our malice, and our pain.
We can be a brutal species who is only just learning to walk the fields of peace and empathy.
We have barely put our foot in the water, and we cannot be trusted to not act in our own, individual, best interest. Not as we are. I hope that one day that changes.Nov 21, · This week I read a post written by Expat with monstermanfilm.com post is about The 4 attributes of third culture kids.
These attributes can make third culture kids global citizens of this world. The post is my inspiration for this week. Thanks. So here are my 10 advantages of growing up abroad, of being a third culture kid.
Third culture kids (TCKs) are one of the many categories or titles used to identify unique groups of people. Here is the definition of a TCK: A Third Culture Kid (TCK) is a person who has spent a significant part of his or her developmental years outside the parents’ culture.
Below is an essay on "Third Culture Kids" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples/5(1). As a third Culture kid, you endure loss, and change, and shock, how on earth are you supposed to sieze the day, when your day is not like any other average american Personal Experience I have lived in three different countries.
A Third Culture Kid (TCK) is a person who has spent a significant part of his or her developmental years outside the parents’ culture.
The TCK frequently builds relationships to all of the cultures, while not having full ownership in any. Describing a third culture kid.
and Americans. She had friends in here home country and new American friends but unfortunately her friends in Cambodia suffered in the war.5/5(1).